Review of TOH cards 2014

Review of the Typology of Harm cards by Jennifer Penton, Griffith University, 2014

The Cards – initial impressions (excerpts)

For me, these cards present an excellent opportunity for practitioners to examine the risks in their own practice and project delivery in community settings, and to build a culture of ethical practice. [...]

I believe there is also enormous potential to develop more advanced and dynamic role play scenarios so that the archetypes can be fully experienced and the effect of the behaviours can be felt by the users. This type of activity can link the intellectual understanding of the archetypes, with the embodied and sensory experience. [...]

Click here to read the full review.

Typology of Harm 2014

2014 Spectres Of Evaluation conference

We presented the first Typology of Harm prototype at the international 'Spectres of Evaluation' conference at the Footscray Community Arts Centre Feb 6-7 2014, commissioned by the Centre for Cultural Partnerships, Victorian College for the Arts, University of Melbourne.

Developed by Change Media's Jennifer Lyons-Reid and Carl Kuddell, after discussions about harm and evaluation, with VCA's Lachlan MacDowall and Marnie Badham and great feedback from the folks at here studio in Melbourne, Michelle Emma James and Ammon Beyerle, the prototype is the first stage of our innovative-disruptive work to include a card game for self evaluation of harm in art and culture, e-reader and online version. The prototype presentation was accompanied by a multimedia art installation of our development-in-progress and a hands-on workshop (sculpture, image work, video, mass player lanyard game).

During the 2-day event, the Department for Critical Illiteracy launched the prototype ‘Typology of Harm in CACD’. After an introduction of the methodology, participants played out different negative value scenarios and developed their own typology of harm, to map out their own experience of harm, by using a unique set of N.I.C.E. cards [Negative Indicators Commonly Experienced]. Our team handed out playing cards to conference delegates to attached tp their lanyards and a brisk trade and collection of cards ensued. We saw a few eager punters trying to collect them all...

Our development of the typology will introduce a range of tools and ‘archetypes’ based on identified negative values and behavior patterns we identified in collaboration with colleagues and community participants over years of 'successful' practise, to open up a dialogue on the issues of harm, risk, power and value. Our method aims to strengthen critical literacy across the sector to support stakeholders to engage on a deep level with problems of power, interdependency, morality, privilege and commodification across the sector.

During a 20-minute panel presentation at the conference to over 100 participants, we raised questions about negative value, harm, complicity of artists and arts managers with in a fear-driven framework and the urgency to reframe our moral belief systems that inform our work.

The 90min hands-on session at 'Spectres' concluded the first research in action phase of the work, framed as a ‘swap-meet’  creative and interactive workshop. 15 participating artists, arts managers and researchers tested the prototype. We also received great feedback throughout the conference pointing to the need for a typology of harm to support a rigorous debate on value in CACD. Many people started collecting and trading the cards, which were attached to the delegates lanyards. We were joined by Michelle Emma James and Ammon Beyerle from herestudio, who supported us to deliver the workshop.

We see Critical Literacy as an essential tool for CACD practice in a colonial context. How can we name key values of our sector, without jeopardising our standing in the sector? What really informs our narratives, beyond spin and funding speak? This Typology of Harm is Change Media's artistic response to a set of questions we posed after 20 years of highly ‘successful’ glorious failures.